• Home
  • Get Some Answers
    • Holy Week Answers
  • Get to Know Us
    • Derek >
      • Poetry
    • Catalina
    • Elin, Atticus, & Denton
    • Transilvania Center for Leadership and Development
    • Mission to the World
  • Get Involved
    • Pray
    • Creative Contributions
    • Give
    • Visit
    • Financial Q&A
  • Get In Touch
    • Newsletters
  • Blog: Ministry in Romania
  • Videos
  • Catechism
  • Home
  • Get Some Answers
    • Holy Week Answers
  • Get to Know Us
    • Derek >
      • Poetry
    • Catalina
    • Elin, Atticus, & Denton
    • Transilvania Center for Leadership and Development
    • Mission to the World
  • Get Involved
    • Pray
    • Creative Contributions
    • Give
    • Visit
    • Financial Q&A
  • Get In Touch
    • Newsletters
  • Blog: Ministry in Romania
  • Videos
  • Catechism
   

We find historical records of Christians who are accepted by the church being soldiers from the mid-late 100's on.

4/18/2014

0 Comments

 
While there are records of Christian soldiers serving in Rome's military, it is unclear whether most or all of these were converted as soldiers or joined the army after conversion. We have a number of records which show the church wasn't keen on individuals joining the military post-conversion. In fact, the first ecumenical council of Nicaea Canon 12 (325) says that the church should break communion with those who re-enter the military after conversion. Other early sources show that those soldiers who were Christians were commanded to do no harm to others (like some translations of the Luke 3 passage). So if you were already a soldier when you converted, finish your 20 or 25 year enlistment because you can't just drop out for religious conviction. But don't join the military because of the moral compromise it would likely eventually bring.

Since early Christianity arose during a time called the pax romana (Peace of Rome) from around 30 BCE to 180 CE, being nonresistant in the army might not be as difficult as one might think. Often times the soldiers would double as construction workers, repair men, postal deliverers, etc. But that doesn't mean soldiers were never faced with the choice to compromise. Martin of Tours is one great example who threw down his arms rather than do violence. And when they did refuse to do the State's bidding of violence or the worship of gods, they were often killed. 

If one still wants to hold a pacifist's feet to the fire (something a pacifist would never do) on this, they run into a huge moral issue. The Apostles - especially Paul - had plenty of opportunity to tell slaveholders - people who owned and objectified other human beings - to give up their slaves. In fact, there's a book of the Bible, Philemon, which is solely dealing with a master and his slave. But Paul never tells the slaveholder to release his slave. Rather, he tells the master to accept his slave back, and most importantly, treat him with love like a brother. 

Paul was not looking to upend the social structure of Rome. The issue for Christians saturated with the gospel and the fresh image of Christ and his sacrifice was that their lives and positions meant nothing. If they were slaves, so be it. If they were abused by fellow Christians, absorb the cost and don't take them to court. If you're a wife to a non-believing husband, show him love. If you are living in an oppressive government that persecutes you, submit and be good citizens. The important thing was the gospel of love. 

John Howard Yoder, in his book "The Politics of Jesus," sums up this notion of the gospel's way to go about addressing our position and seeking social justice. 

"[Paul's] first element of counsel is to remain in the social status within which one is; 'in whatever state each was called, there let him remain with God' (v. 24). This applied to the slave's remaining a slave, to the single person's remaining single, to the married woman's remaining with her unbelieving husband, to the forsaken married woman's remaining unmarried without her husband as long as he lives; to accepting one's status as circumcised or as not circumcised. The reasoning supporting this general admonition is not that to change in any of these ways would be sinful or wrong, in the sense of an infraction of the law of God. The concern of the apostle is rather to assist everyone to remain 'free from anxieties' (v. 32), in a world whose structures are impermanent, and not so important that we should concentrate our efforts upon changing our status with regard to them. ('The appointed time has grown very short; from now on let those who have wives live as though they have none...for the form of this world is passing away' [vv. 29-31].)...

Yet right alongside this concern for that freedom which is maintained by not being rebellious about one's status in the present, there runs a second strand of instruction which seems at first to be opposed to it. If a slave can become free, he should avail himself of this opportunity (v. 21). If the husband of the forsaken woman dies she is free to remarry (v. 39); if anyone is strongly inclined toward marriage, that is quite proper (v. 36), but a freed man must not become a slave since that would be to move away from rather than toward freedom (vv. 22-23). Thus the Christian is called to view social status from the perspective of maximizing freedom. One who is given an opportunity to exercise more freedom should do so, because we are called to freedom in Christ. Yet that freedom can already become real within one's present status by voluntarily accepting subordination, in view of the relative unimportance of such social distinctions when seen in the light of the coming fulfillment of God's purposes... The apostles rather transformed the concept of living within a role by finding how in each role the servanthood of Christ - the voluntary subordination of one who knows that another regime is normative - could be made concrete. The wife or child or slave who can accept subordination because 'it is fitting in the Lord' has not forsaken the radicality of the call of Jesus; it is precisely this attitude toward the structures of this world, this freedom from needing to smash them since they are about to crumble anyway, which Jesus had been the first to teach and in his suffering concretize." 

It is this allegiance to the Kingdom, and our freedom from the powers of the world's kingdoms which allows us to truly live free. And when we do, we change society more holistically than any other power structure, because we use God's means and because we begin with the hearts of humanity rather than the coercive powers lorded over them. And we because we begin with our own hearts, the world can see that we truly are loving, genuine, and changed. Such freedom becomes irresistible to those who observe it.

Now, if you begin to make these prescribed changes in yourself. If you begin to live free despite your circumstances, and without a focused agenda of toppling structures and regimes. If you follow what the apostles tell you and you pray for kings (even evil ones) and submit to their rule, the apostles don't have to say outright that you shouldn't be a zealot. If you are a slaveholder and you are told to love everyone - including your human property - as brothers, you don't have to attack slavery head on and upend that institution. And if you tell soldiers to do no violence, you don't have to tell everyone to quit being soldiers or not to join the army. We moderns have it backwards as we tend towards the pursuit of legislation to change hearts. Maybe the apostles didn't attack institutions like slavery or the army head-on because doing so could have labeled them as subversive to the national good. But I think the Apostles understood that rather than changing legislation and abolishing institutions in order to change hearts, changed hearts would undermine evil institutions and evil within institutions. 
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    *The views and ideas on this site are in no way affiliated with any organization, business, or individuals we are a part of or work with. They're also not theological certainties. They're simply thinking out loud, on issues and difficulties as I process things.

    Categories

    All
    Abortion
    Abortion Counterrebuttals
    Afterlife
    Apologetics
    Atheism
    Baptism
    Christian Life
    Church
    Cosmology
    COVID 19
    COVID-19
    Death
    Free Will
    Generosity And Wealth
    G.K. Chesterton
    Government
    Grace And Mercy
    Incarnation
    Inerrancy
    Joy
    Love
    Materialism
    Meaningpurpose
    Media
    Ministry-and-outreach
    Morality
    On-guard
    Pacifism
    Pacifism-counterrebuttals
    Podcast
    Poetry
    Politics
    Politics-of-jesus
    Pragmatism And Consequentialism
    Prayer
    Problem-of-evil
    Race-and-unity
    Rapid Fire
    Rebellion
    Reformed
    Relationships
    Salvation
    Social-issues
    Social-justice
    Sovereignty-of-god
    Spirit
    Spiritual-warfare
    Spontaneous-expansion-of-the-church
    Suffering
    Tradition
    Trinity
    When-helping-hurts


    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    March 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2013
    March 2009
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007

    RESOURCES

    Check out some of our favorite online resources for theology and apologetics by clicking on the images below. 

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly