• Home
  • Get Some Answers
    • Holy Week Answers
  • Get to Know Us
    • Derek >
      • Poetry
    • Catalina
    • Elin, Atticus, & Denton
    • Transilvania Center for Leadership and Development
    • Mission to the World
  • Get Involved
    • Pray
    • Creative Contributions
    • Give
    • Visit
    • Financial Q&A
  • Get In Touch
    • Newsletters
  • Blog: Ministry in Romania
  • Videos
  • Catechism
  • Home
  • Get Some Answers
    • Holy Week Answers
  • Get to Know Us
    • Derek >
      • Poetry
    • Catalina
    • Elin, Atticus, & Denton
    • Transilvania Center for Leadership and Development
    • Mission to the World
  • Get Involved
    • Pray
    • Creative Contributions
    • Give
    • Visit
    • Financial Q&A
  • Get In Touch
    • Newsletters
  • Blog: Ministry in Romania
  • Videos
  • Catechism
   

Pacifists embrace injustice because they're willing to let other innocent people die for their convictions.

4/3/2014

0 Comments

 
Assuming that killing another person is the only way to protect the innocent in a given situation, then yes, pacifists are willing to let innocent people die to avoid transgressing their conviction that killing is wrong. However, for those who think there is such a thing as a just war, the same problem applies. If one believes that there are parameters in which a war can be just, and parameters in which it can be unjust, then that individual has certain convictions pertaining to war. They recognize that there are actions that can make a war or an action within war wrong. This often means that the just war adherent is faced with causing or allowing the innocent to suffer. 

We can look at civilian death as a result of wartime action as one clear example. WWII saw about the same numbers of civilians killed by direct military action as military participants who were killed. When you factor in civilian deaths from indirect causes (famine, the elements, etc), it is estimated that WWII saw over twice as many civilian deaths as military deaths. But even if we leave the civilian travesty that was WWII, it is still a given today that some civilians will lose their lives for our convictions that our cause is just. When we bomb, assault, raid, or blockade a locale, we have an effect on civilians. Sometimes our bombs and bullets hit civilians, and sometimes our bombs and blockades destroy or prevent the building of shelters, hospitals, or food supplies. We know that even in a war most consider just, civilians will pay for that conviction.

But civilians can also pay for our convictions in another way. Instead of dying due to an army's actions, civilians can die due to an army's inaction. There are many genocides and humanitarian crises in which the United States did not intervene because they couldn't or didn't justify the action as a whole. Our picking and choosing of which innocent lives to save based on our just war convictions means that we let some people die for those convictions. Furthermore, there can be civilian deaths due to our inactivity in specific situations. In Vietnam we had the problem of the Vietnamese often dodging in and out of Cambodia - a country in which the U.S. was not allowed to go to pursue fighting. Imagine that hostages or civilians across the border faced imminent harm. What would we do? In general, we would refuse to assist them because it would breach our parameters for warfare. Entering Cambodia would be unjust for us because we didn't have sufficient cause to pick a fight with them. There are many circumstances in which an army under just war conditions must not save the innocent for the sake of their convictions.

Just war theory faces the same accusation as pacifism here. The difference is that those who adhere to a just war tend to think that a loss of civilian life can be legitimate in the long run if the loss is unintentional (though many think intentional killings, like the A-bomb were legitimate) and if the loss is as a result of military action that seeks a greater good. Just war adherents also think that a loss of civilian life by withholding force in morally compromised situations provides them with an excuse for allowing civilian deaths, as they seek to maintain their convictions and standards so their war can continue being justified in their eyes. 
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    *The views and ideas on this site are in no way affiliated with any organization, business, or individuals we are a part of or work with. They're also not theological certainties. They're simply thinking out loud, on issues and difficulties as I process things.

    Categories

    All
    Abortion
    Abortion Counterrebuttals
    Afterlife
    Apologetics
    Atheism
    Baptism
    Christian Life
    Church
    Cosmology
    COVID 19
    COVID-19
    Death
    Free Will
    Generosity And Wealth
    G.K. Chesterton
    Government
    Grace And Mercy
    Incarnation
    Inerrancy
    Joy
    Love
    Materialism
    Meaningpurpose
    Media
    Ministry-and-outreach
    Morality
    On-guard
    Pacifism
    Pacifism-counterrebuttals
    Podcast
    Poetry
    Politics
    Politics-of-jesus
    Pragmatism And Consequentialism
    Prayer
    Problem-of-evil
    Race-and-unity
    Rapid Fire
    Rebellion
    Reformed
    Relationships
    Salvation
    Social-issues
    Social-justice
    Sovereignty-of-god
    Spirit
    Spiritual-warfare
    Spontaneous-expansion-of-the-church
    Suffering
    Tradition
    Trinity
    When-helping-hurts


    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    March 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2013
    March 2009
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007

    RESOURCES

    Check out some of our favorite online resources for theology and apologetics by clicking on the images below. 

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly